2002/03 childcare and early years workforce survey : nursery schools
Bibliographic record
Abstract
12 months, equal to four hundred paid staff across all settings. 27.Of those who left the organisation in the last 12 months, it was believed that around half (50%) obtained other posts in the childcare and early years sector; one in seven (15%) went to jobs in other sectors and a quarter (26%) didn't take up any other employment. 28.The turnover rate 3 for paid staff across the whole sector was 11%, of which about 5.5%went to other early years or childcare settings and 5.5% left the sector altogether.The employment growth rate was 13% 4 .Childcare and Early Years Workforce Survey 2002/03: Nursery Schools2 This is calculated by dividing the total number recruited by the total number currently employed -plus those leaving their current employment minus those recruited.It should be noted therefore that this recruitment rate takes account of the 'churn within the sector' as well as the number of staff being recruited to the sector.3 This is calculated by dividing the total number leaving their employment by the total currently employed less the difference between those recruited and those leaving their current employment.It should be noted that this turnover rate therefore includes 'churn within the sector' as well as staff leaving the sector.4 This is calculated by dividing the net change in staff by the total currently employed less the difference between those recruited and those leaving their current employment.It should be noted that this employment growth rate therefore includes 'churn within the sector' as well as staff joining or leaving the sector.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".