Cal Poly Dominates Regional Civil Engineering Contest Advances to National Finals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cal Poly students placed first overall in the American Society of Civil Engineers Pacific Southwest Regional Conference for the 11th time in 12 years.The win was secured with six first place wins in the Concrete Canoe competition.Held at Cal State Northridge, the competition pitted 84 civil engineering students from Cal Poly's student chapter against teams from Southern California, Arizona, Hawaii, Nevada and Japan.The first-place regional win secures Cal Poly's place at the national finals which will be held in Montreal, June 19-21."The conference was filled with many exciting moments, including many close canoe races," said Sheila Shideh, executive vice president of the Cal Poly Society of Civil Engineers."I am so proud of all SCE members who participated, every one of whom contributed to our ultimate victory."The competition is scored on design, project management, oral and written presentations, teamwork, and the performance of the canoe.Cal Poly placed first in Men's Sprint, Men's Slalom/Endurance, Oral Presentation and Final Product.The team came in second for Design Paper, Women's Sprint, Women's Slalom/Endurance, and Co-ed Sprint.In other conference events, Cal Poly placed first in Surveying, Quiz Bowl, Concrete Frisbee, Wiffle Ball and Tug-of-War.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it