MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7017888399

Cerh-ta‘dîl ilminin hicrî ilk iki asırdaki gelişim

2014· other· tr· W7017888399 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMarmara University Open Access System · 2014
Typeother
Languagetr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicIslamic Thought and Society Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Subject (documents)Signs and symptomsPeriod (music)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hadislerin sıhhatine dair yapılacak değerlendirmelerin merkezinde isnâd; isnâd araştırmalarının odağında ise râvîler bulunmaktadır. Hadislerin aktarımını gerçekleştiren bu râvîler ise Cerh-Ta‘dîl İlminin temel konusu olmuştur.\nBu çalışmada Cerh-Ta‘dîl İlminin hicrî ilk iki asırda gerçekleştirmiş olduğu gelişim seyri incelenmiştir. Hicrî II. asrın ilk çeyreğine kadar ki dönem Cerh-Ta‘dîl İlmini tesis eden düşüncenin anlaşılmasında, dolayısıyla Cerh-Ta‘dîl İlminin temellendirilmesinde önemli bir rol oynaktadır. Bu dönemdeki tenkit düşüncesinin cerh-ta‘dîlin ilim hüviyeti kazanmasında önemli misyon üstlenen aktörlere etkisi; başka bir ifadeyle Cerh-ta‘dil İlminin doğuşunun arka planı detaylıca ele alınmıştır. \nCerh-Ta‘dîl İlminin hadis ilimleri içerisinde yer almasını sağlayan etbâü’t-tâbiîn dönemi münekkitlerinin tespiti ve objektif bir kriter dahilinde sınıflandırılması, kimin ne ölçüde ricâl tenkidine katkıda bulunduğunu açık bir şekilde ortaya koymak amacıyla yapılmıştır. Etbâü’t-tâbiîn tabakasındaki birinci düzey münekkitlerin cerh-ta‘dîl sahasında otoriteleşme süreçleri, etbâü’t-tâbiîn tabakasına ait ilk nesil münekkitlerinin bir sonraki kuşakla olan ilişkisi, aralarında râvîlerin güvenilirlikleri, cerh-ta‘dîl esasları gibi konularda görüş ayrılıklarının bulunup bulunmadığı, herhangi bir ihtilaf söz konusu ise bunların nedenleri gibi konular Cerh-ta‘dîl İlminin gelişim seyrini ortaya koymada ehemmiyetli addedilmiş ve detaylıca tetkik edilmiştir. Ayrıca söz konusu döneme ait ricâl tenkitlerinin aktarımı ve münekkitler tarafından kullanılan değerlendirme lafızları ve delâlet ettikleri manalar tetkik edilmiştir. \n\nABSTRACT\nIsnad is located in the centre of the assessments regarding the authenticity of the Hadith and transmitters of the Hadith are located in the focus of isnad examinations. Narrators has been the main subject of the science of al-Jarh and al-ta‘dil.\nIn this thesis, the course of the development of the science of al-jarh and al-ta‘dîl in the first two centuries has been examined. The period until the first quarter of the second century Hijri plays an important role in understanding of the mentality evolving the science of jarh and ta‘dîl; hence in foundation of this science. The impact of the idea of criticism in this period on the actors undertaking a important mission in acquiring of al-jarh and al-ta‘dil a scientific identity has been discussed.\nEtbau al-tabi‘in critics providing the science of al-jarh and al-ta‘dil take part within the sciences of the hadit has been determined. What is more, these critics have been classified under objective criteria in order to demonstrate explicitly who contributed to the transmitters’ criticism to what extent. Primary critics’ process of gaining their own authority in the field of al-jarh and al-ta‘dil, the relationship between primary critics, controversial subjects concerning assessment principles between them has also been investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarmara University Open Access SystemSame topicIslamic Thought and Society StudiesFrench-language works237,207