Determining Access: Theory and Practice in Implementing Indigenous Governance over Lands and Resources Conference Program
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conference program.\nSession 1: Indigenous territorial governance in the Interior \n\nImplementing a declaration of Aboriginal Title.\nChief Russell Myers Ross, Yunesit’in, Tsilhqot’in Nation\n\nLogging to challenge provincial and assert Indigenous jurisdiction.\nArthur Manuel, George Manuel Institute and Secwepemc plaintiff in ongoing title litigation \n\nIndigenous Governance and Aboriginal Title: Identifying the Holders of Authority and Rights.\nProfessor Kent McNeil, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University\n\nSession 2: Indigenous law and Indigenous governance\n\nPipsell (Jacko Lake), Ajax Mine and Stk’emplusemc Te Secwepemc Nation\nStatement of Claim and Project Assessment Process\nDr. Ron Ignace, Kukpi7 (Chief) of Skeetchestn \n\nHat Creek Land Use Plan. \nKukpi7 (Chief) Ryan Day, Stuctwewsemc, Secwepemc Spokesperson for the Interior Alliance together with Chief Darrell Bob, Xaxli’p, St’at’imc Spokesperson for the Interior Alliance.\n\nPipelines, Aboriginal Law and Indigenous Authority.\nProfessor Gordon Christie, Associate Professor of Law, University of British Columbia, Director, Indigenous Legal Studies Program, University of British Columbia.\n\nSession 3: Indigenous territorial governance and environmental stewardship (fisheries, forests and waters)\n\nHaida Nation Governance.\nGuujaaw, Skidigate representative and past president, Council of the Haida Nation \n\nTransmountain Pipeline Project.\nRueben George, Tseil-Wauthuth Nation \n\nIntersections between Environmental Law and Indigenous Governance of Aboriginal Title.\nProfessor Sharon Mascher, Faculty of Law, University of Calgary\n\nSession 4: Indigenous Knowledge and Alliances\n\nEarth Conciliations: The Burgeoning Work of Indigenous Territorial Authority in Alliance with Settler Polities.\nProfessor Brian Noble, Dalhousie University, Department of Anthropology\n\nSmall “t” Treaty Relations: Decolonizing L’sitkuk Ancestral Homelands.\nSherry Pictou, PhD Candidate, Dalhousie University\n\nIndigenous Peoples’ Control over Access to Biodiversity and Indigenous Knowledge in the Interior of British Columbia\nProfessor Nicole Schabus, TRU Faculty of Law
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.079 | 0.135 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.019 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.016 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".