Dehumanization and Genocide: the Beginning of the State
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although this research is on-going, it attempts to draw a conclusion on various critical questions regarding the desire of Indigenous women to join and participate in politics. It is important to understand the challenges Indigenous women fight to be in politics and the types of policies they push to implement. By doing so, we can examine the types of issues pertaining mostly to Indigenous women and their communities, and seek to address them. Although there has been an exponential increase in research on Indigenous topics, awareness of the colonial project and its implemented strategies against Indigenous people continues to be dismissed as a historical event. However, it is critical to understand the past, analyze historical movements, and work towards repairing the damage these events caused to Indigenous people. The colonial project continues to oppress Indigenous communities and people across Canada. This paper examines three distinct tools used by the British government to colonize and exterminate or assimilate Indigenous communities to European culture. As such, the presentation will be broken down into three main sections: Geography, Institutions, and Laws and Policies. First, it discusses the strategic geographical manipulation in the past as an asset to their advantage. Immediately following this are the current geographical challenges forced on numerous Indigenous communities like the water crisis and their access to basic needs. Secondly, the presentation will review the use of institutions like the Residential 'School' System for mass genocide of both the Indigenous culture and the children. This will be followed by the current effects of these institutions and the recent discoveries of unmarked grave sites at previous Residential 'Schools' locations. Thirdly, this presentation will explore the various policies and laws constricting Indigenous nations and people from resisting colonization and from protecting their communities. Following these historical policies will be a brief review of the abuse of the Federal government's fiduciary duty to Indigenous people and various limitations of Indigenous Constitutional and Charter rights.At the end of the presentation, the conclusion is presented as a summary of findings detailing key information throughout the presentation and lastly, an opening to further questions from the audience. The key terms in this presentation are Indigenous, colonialism, dehumanization, decolonization, land, Canada, and communities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.080 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".