MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7018382116

Designing co-located multi-device audio experiences

2024· other· en· W7018382116 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueWhite Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSet (abstract data type)Context (archaeology)Perspective (graphical)Sound designExtant taxonInteraction designDesign methodsQualitative researchDiversification (marketing strategy)Best practice
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The widespread distribution and diversification of mobile computing devices presents new opportunities for the development and consumption of new interactive, immersive and accessible media experiences using multiple connected devices. Tools now exist for the creation of these experiences; however, there is still limited understanding of the best design practices and use cases for the technology, especially in the context of audio experiences. Furthermore, the little extant research on multi-device audio experiences is fragmented, leading to problems navigating the research. The work in this thesis approached these issues through a two step programme. The first step involved improving understanding of these experiences from a conceptual perspective and identifying relevant design concepts. The application space of co-located multi-device audio experiences is explored and documented through a review of the literature and a survey. Through qualitative analysis of the obtained information, an initial set of seven design dimensions, synchronisation, context, position, relationship, interactivity, organisation, and distribution, were proposed that capture distinct design considerations and can be used to characterise and compare experiences. The dimensions were evaluated in a series of workshops where they were found to be useful as a co-design tool for experience ideation. The second step comprised of identifying new experience opportunities and using distinct yet complementary methods to gain new insights. Two case studies were conducted that focused on delivering concurrent personal and shared audio on different devices. The first focused on the design and technical implementation of a novel multi-device audio prototype using a practice-based approach, where a new design dimension, perception, was also identified. The second focused on the evaluation of the listening experience of using wireless earbuds with active transparency for augmenting TV audio through a controlled listening test. A novel experimental method is presented and production recommendations were provided for this multi-device audio reproduction medium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.321
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWhite Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)French-language works237,207