Desires for childhood (the body and its metamorphoses in Lewis Carroll and James Matthew Barrie)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans les Alice et Peter Pan, Lewis Carroll et James Matthew Barrie reconstituent leur objet de désir, étudient le corps en métamorphose, le développement du monstrueux, jusqu à l altération des enveloppes corporelles de leurs enfants rêvés qui se fragmentent et créent des doubles. Les auteurs, mus par leur désir de soumission, imposent au lecteur une vision unique de leurs œuvres, manipulent le héros en tentant de diriger la progression de sa vie et en mettant inlassablement en scène sa mort. Alice et Peter s évertuent à accéder à l incorporel pour oublier matérialité et mortalité, et leurs créateurs les dotent de traits androgynes pour nier leur sexualité et retrouver le reflet d eux-mêmes dans ces êtres. Leur corps apparaît malgré tout comme le siège de sensations charnelles et s expose au regard d un observateur amoureux et voyeur qui s interroge sur la limite qu il doit s imposer dans son fantasme de fusion avec son objet de désir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".