Development of Slovenian school in Toronto and their contribution to the education and preservation of Slovenian identity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
V magistrskem delu smo obravnavali slovensko šolo Brezmadežne s čudodelno svetinjo v Torontu. Pregledali smo literaturo in v teoretičnem delu najprej predstavili zgodovino preseljevanja Slovencev na ozemlje današnjega mesta Toronto: kdo so bili prvi izseljenci, zakaj je prišlo do izseljevanja in kako je potekalo skozi različna časovna obdobja. Raziskali smo začetke prve slovenske šole v župniji Mariji Pomagaj in njene naslednice, ki je danes še edina delujoča na ozemlju velemesta. Poleg predstavitve šol smo na kratko predstavili še organizacije, ki so ugodno vplivale na medsebojno povezovanje priseljencev. V zadnjem delu teoretičnega dela smo opisali težave, s katerimi so se srečali prvi izseljenci in težave, ki so prisotne v današnjem času. Za empirični del smo obiskali mesto Toronto, kjer smo pridobili podatke. Opravili smo zastavljene intervjuje z ravnateljico slovenske šole, učitelji, duhovnikoma, posameznimi starejšimi izseljenci in vodstvom Doma Lipa. V magistrskem delu so predstavljeni izsledki vseh pogovorov. Želeli smo raziskati, kako slovenska šola deluje, koliko učencev imajo, s katerimi težavami se srečujejo, kako je urejeno izobraževanje učiteljev, kdo jih financira, predpiše gradivo in kako so povezani z Republiko Slovenijo. Del empiričnega dela je analiza učnega gradiva (Čas za slovenščino in Materina beseda) in tritedenski obisk Republike Slovenije v okviru Mladinske poletne šole. V okviru izseljeniških zgodb so predstavljene nekatere pripovedi starostnikov.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".