Do educador governante à racionalidade neoliberal da profissão docente
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Education plays a decisive and transforming role in the process of human formation, and in this context, the teacher has an extremely important role in contributing to the preparation of the subjects that will participate in life in society. Therefore, the critical investigation of teaching practice constitutes a central point in educational research. With this in mind, the present work, which will consist of three articles in dialogue with each other, presents, at its core, the teaching practice, with a more specific look at the educator's role in the context of neoliberal society. The objective of this work is to promote reflections on the educator's place in the current situation of education, and how, by thinking of an educator in the proposed molds of a governing educator, it is possible to consider an advance in the school and social formation of the student. Our journey will start by reflecting on the concept of the ruling educator present in a hypothetical state of nature, as pointed out by the philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau, especially in his work Emile: or, On Education (2004). At this point we aim to characterize the natural pedagogy proposed by the author, as we seek to understand the role of the teacher in this process and how the relationship between educator, student, and knowledge is configured in the formation of the individual and of society. After this first stage of analysis, we move on to our current situation, to delineate and elucidate how an educational formation that is characterized as technicality, built by and for the labor market, based on a political-economic logic called neoliberal, impacts both education and the educator himself. To this end, we will rely on the work The New Way of the World: On Neoliberal Society (2016), by Pierre Dardot and Christian Laval to characterize the neo-subject that arises from this current. Having traced this path, our goal is to consider which paths this society is taking and how education and, especially, the educator, are configured in the face of a new logic of life. Still following the proposal of thinking about the teacher in contemporaneity and how to consider possible updates of the natural pedagogy of the philosopher from Geneva for this context, our third article seeks to investigate the pedagogical authority amid the neoliberal context, resuming the concepts of emancipation, freedom, and humanism defended by Rousseau. To consolidate this last step, we will also resort to Hannah Arendt and the concept of authority treated by her in her work Between the Past and the Future (2001), to consider the relevance of such concept for teaching practice because of an integral human formation, as an instrument of balance between technicality in audiovisual culture and humanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".