MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7018662902

The economics of resource tracking in a solitary forager, the eastern chipmunk (Tamias striatus) /

2003· dissertation· en· W7018662902 on OpenAlexafffundabout

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2003
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Behavior and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityLibrary and Archives Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsResource (disambiguation)Public policyGovernment (linguistics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a variable environment, the ability to track food resources that vary in time and space may increase the foraging efficiency of individuals. Tracking can be accomplished by repeatedly visiting patches, but this sampling will be economical only if its benefits outweigh its costs. I examined the effects of patch characteristics and social factors on sampling using simulation models and both large- and small-scale field experiments on eastern chipmunks ( Tamias striatus). In the first experiment, chipmunks discovered large renewing patches within a few days, sampled them frequently enough to detect most renewals, and then decreased their sampling effort after renewal ceased, showing that they can track patches over both long and short time scales. Sampling rate was higher for animals that lived near the patch, for animals that were more aggressive while in the patch, and when the number of other animals that sampled was high, but was unaffected by the quantity and frequency of renewal. I developed a model, which predicts that the optimal sampling frequency should increase with the frequency and duration of renewal and with the rate of gain in the patch, and decrease with the duration of each sampling trip. An extension of this model predicts that conspecifics will affect even non-group foragers, by competing for food and providing social information. A second field experiment showed that chipmunks decreased their sampling in response to higher competition. Although chipmunks used social information to discover a patch, there was no indication that social information caused a decrease in sampling. In conclusion, sampling to keep track of varying patches is an important component of the foraging behaviour of chipmunks. Optimal sampling behaviour is affected by patch characteristics and sampling rate will depend on (i) the ease with which animals can estimate these characteristics, (ii) the level of competition, which can alter the patch valu

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicAnimal Behavior and Reproduction→French-language works237,207→