MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7018697855

Down on the Farm: NAFTA's Seven-Years War on Farmers and Ranchers in Alabama

2001· other· en· W7018697855 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIssue Lab (Candid) · 2001
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNet farm incomeFarm incomeAgribusinessFellNet incomeEconomic impact analysisHousehold income
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the summer of 2001, family farmers and ranchers throughout North America are struggling. During the 1993 debate over the fate of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Alabama farmers and ranchers as well as farm communities across the U.S. were promised that NAFTA would provide access to new export markets and thus would finally bring a lasting solution to farmers off-and-on struggles for economic success. Now, seven years later, the evidence shows the income of independent Alabama farmers and national farm income has declined, consumer prices have risen and some giant agribusinesses have reaped huge profits. Total net income for farm operations in Alabama increased between 1993 and 1999 but all of the income gain was in corporate farms, when corporate income increases are eliminated farm income drops steeply in Alabama. Total Alabama net farm income grew by 31% between 1993 and 1999 to $1.2 billion. However, net farm income for non-corporate Alabama farm operations fell 74% between 1993 and 1999 from $51.4 million to $13.4 million. In Alabama, 2,000 farms have disappeared during the seven years of NAFTA. Nationally, farms have disappeared faster since NAFTA went into effect than in years that preceded it, but in Alabama, the number of farms grew before NAFTA was enacted but that gain was doubly reversed in the years since NAFTA. The total number of Alabama farms grew by 2.1% in the years before NAFTA (1988-1993) but fell by 4.1% after NAFTA went into effect between 1994 and 2000. These outcomes are defining the growing national debates over President Bush s proposals to establish Fast Track trade authority and to expand NAFTA through the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA). This report documents the basis for farmers concern about NAFTA and its model of export-oriented agriculture with a special Alabama supplement which examines the impact of NAFTA on Alabama farmers. For the past seven years, the jewel of Alabama's agriculture, the state's peanut crop, has been decimated by NAFTA. Alabama farmers raising beef cattle have seen prices decline since NAFTA. Alabama tomato acreage and prices have declined significantly, facing significant import competition from Mexican tomatoes. Alabama wheat and soybean growers also have seen farmgate prices decline significantly since NAFTA went into effect. Alabama lumber mills have faced unfair competition from cheap imports of Canadian softwood lumber.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0200.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIssue Lab (Candid)French-language works237,207