MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7018697855

Down on the Farm: NAFTA's Seven-Years War on Farmers and Ranchers in Alabama

2001· other· en· W7018697855 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIssue Lab (Candid) · 2001
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNet farm incomeFarm incomeAgribusinessFellNet incomeEconomic impact analysisHousehold income
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the summer of 2001, family farmers and ranchers throughout North America are struggling. During the 1993 debate over the fate of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Alabama farmers and ranchers as well as farm communities across the U.S. were promised that NAFTA would provide access to new export markets and thus would finally bring a lasting solution to farmers off-and-on struggles for economic success. Now, seven years later, the evidence shows the income of independent Alabama farmers and national farm income has declined, consumer prices have risen and some giant agribusinesses have reaped huge profits. Total net income for farm operations in Alabama increased between 1993 and 1999 but all of the income gain was in corporate farms, when corporate income increases are eliminated farm income drops steeply in Alabama. Total Alabama net farm income grew by 31% between 1993 and 1999 to $1.2 billion. However, net farm income for non-corporate Alabama farm operations fell 74% between 1993 and 1999 from $51.4 million to $13.4 million. In Alabama, 2,000 farms have disappeared during the seven years of NAFTA. Nationally, farms have disappeared faster since NAFTA went into effect than in years that preceded it, but in Alabama, the number of farms grew before NAFTA was enacted but that gain was doubly reversed in the years since NAFTA. The total number of Alabama farms grew by 2.1% in the years before NAFTA (1988-1993) but fell by 4.1% after NAFTA went into effect between 1994 and 2000. These outcomes are defining the growing national debates over President Bush s proposals to establish Fast Track trade authority and to expand NAFTA through the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA). This report documents the basis for farmers concern about NAFTA and its model of export-oriented agriculture with a special Alabama supplement which examines the impact of NAFTA on Alabama farmers. For the past seven years, the jewel of Alabama's agriculture, the state's peanut crop, has been decimated by NAFTA. Alabama farmers raising beef cattle have seen prices decline since NAFTA. Alabama tomato acreage and prices have declined significantly, facing significant import competition from Mexican tomatoes. Alabama wheat and soybean growers also have seen farmgate prices decline significantly since NAFTA went into effect. Alabama lumber mills have faced unfair competition from cheap imports of Canadian softwood lumber.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIssue Lab (Candid)French-language works237,207