Encountering a stranger during a forest walk
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of encountering another person during a forest walk and it's impacts on restoration.The MIST (Montreal Imaging Stress Task) was employed to create cognitive and physiological stress in 82 students.Three different conditions either simulated an encounter with a stranger, an encounter with an acquaintance or a situation with no encounter.During the whole procedure the heart rate was assessed.The PANAS (Positive and Negative Affect Scale) evaluated participants' individual perception of the situation as well as several self-report measurements evaluated the experience of restoration and contact experience and the attitude towards the walk.Results of the PANAS revealed a higher rating of the positive contact scale in the stranger condition than in the no-encounter condition as well as in the acquaintance condition.Results of the analysed heart rate change revealed that participants of the acquaintance condition underwent a declined level of restoration compared to participants of the stranger condition.Summing up, these findings show that participants of the acquaintance condition evaluated their situation less positive and restored worse than participants of the stranger condition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".