MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7018752930

THE EFFECT OF A SELF-INSTRUCTIONAL SLIDE-TAPE PROGRAM ON DIETARY KNOWLEDGE AND DIETARY COMPLIANCE OF RENAL DIALYSIS PATIENTS

2023· dissertation· en· W7018752930 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDialysisCompliance (psychology)PopulationKidney diseaseKidneyPatient compliance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This project studied the effect of a self-instructional slide-tape program upon dietary knowledge and dietary compliance of renal patients on dialysis. The study was comprised of two parts. The first part involved the development of the slide-tape program. The second part dealt directly with the research problem. During this phase, the slide-tape program was presented to the renal patients while on dialysis and data were collected to determine the effect of the program upon dietary knowledge and dietary compliance. The slide-tape program, based on accepted renal diet therapy, was composed of two 14-minute segments and was accompanied by individual study guides. The first segment discussed the role of the kidney and the requirements for protein and kilocalories. The second segment discussed the need for potassium, sodium and fluid and the hazards of excesses of these nutrients. Partway through each segment and at the end of each segment, patients were presented true-false questions. The answers appeared immediately following the questions. The target population consisted of 26 renal patients who were receiving dialysis therapy on an out-patient basis at St. Paul's Hospital in Saskatoon. Patients in the treatment group (n=14) completed pre and post tests and viewed the slide-tape program. The control group (n=12) completed pre and post tests and did not view the slide-tape program. Data were collected from April until November, 1979. Data collection instruments included (1) pre and post dietary knowledge questionnaires, (2) pre and post 7-day food records and (3) pre and post biochemical measurements (weight gained between dialysis, predialysis serum potassium, and predialysis serum urea). The pre and post tests were analyzed to determine significant differences between the treatment and control groups. Results indicated that the self-instructional slide-tape program did not significantly increase dietary knowledge or improve dietary compliance of the study subjects (p=0.05). Variables of interest in the study were analyzed. The mean age of the sample was 44.73 years. The sex distribution of the sample was 35% male and 65% female. The greatest proportion of study subjects, 46% of the sample, reported an educational level of grade 10-12. The cause of renal failure was primarily glomerulonephritis (46% of the sample), with polycystic kidney disease and interstitial nephritis being the second and third most common causes of renal failure in study subjects (18% and 8% of the sample, respectively). Subjects were questioned about prior dietary instruction with the dietitian. The sample averaged 4 meetings and 2.40 hours with the dietitian. The average length of time of dialysis therapy for the sample was 14.73 months. Although the research study did not demonstrate significant effects of the slide-tape program on dietary knowledge and dietary compliance, its value as an educational tool remains. Evidence exists that the slide-tape program may benefit individuals having had no previous dietary instruction. In addition, the slide-tape program has several advantages including self-presentation, standard presentation and availability. The slide-tape program can be a useful addition to renal diet education programs

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)→Same topicDialysis and Renal Disease Management→French-language works237,207→