MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W70188528

A History of Russian Cinema

2009· article· en· W70188528 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Frederick H. White

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Slavonic Papers · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMovie theaterPoliticsRussian historySlavic languagesHistoryRussian cultureArt historyClassicsLiteratureArtPolitical scienceAncient historyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Birgit Beumers. A History of Russian Cinema. Oxford: Berg, 2009. 328 pp. Appendix. Chronology. Index. $32.95, paper.As Russian film courses have become increasingly common on university campuses, many instructors have been obliged create Readers, in which students are provided with articles and chapters by the leading Slavic scholars. Missing of late has been an adequate history of Russian cinema that could chart for students the developments from silent film contemporary post-Soviet fare. Jay Leyda's Kino: A History of the Russian and Soviet Film (originally published in 1960), long a mainstay, can no longer bring students to the present as it had once promised. Now, Birgit Beumers offers a text perfectly suited for survey courses of Russian/Soviet cinema. It will not completely replace those original Readers, but it will provide the concise and clearly written survey that has been much needed of late.A History of Russian Cinema is organized into eight chapters (and an appendix and chronology), beginning with the first time that Auguste and Louis Lumiere's films were shown in Russia, right through the election of Dmitrii Medvedev as president in 2008 marking, in particular, a century of Russian cinema since the first Russian-produced film, Stenka Razin (1908), was screened. Beumers states that this book is meant as a chronological overview of the advances and trends of Russian cinema as they have been connected political, historical, cultural and social developments (p. 1).Chapter One concentrates on the establishment of Russian film companies, Evgenii Bauer's melodramas, and the role of cinema in political agitation. The following chapter examines cinema for the masses (1919-1929) with a particular focus on Soviet montage and the Cultural Revolution. Attention is paid the directors Dziga Vertov, Sergei Eisenstein, Vsevolod Pudovkin, and Aleksandr Dovzhenko. Chapter Three covers the Purges, the Second World War and the Cold War ( 1 930-1 953). It is argued that these films abandon the experimentation of the previous period and are mainly concerned with creating heroic images. In the chapter on the Thaw (1954-1966), Beumers successfully captures many of the ambiguities and complexities (p. 1 12) of the period, while highlighting a new concentration on youthfulness, the individual experience, and laughter. This interlude of hope, however, was soon dashed as Russia was forced endure the Stagnation (19671982). Soviet cinema suffered greatly during the early 1970s, but did begin make a recovery with the work of Andrei Tarkovskii and Nikita Mikhalkov, as well as with the international success of the Academy Award winning Moscow Does Not Believe in Tears (1979). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Slavonic PapersSame topicCinema and Media StudiesFrench-language works237,207