MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7018875134

Enhancement of Local Buckling Behaviour of Steel Structures Retrofitted Through Bonding GFRP Plates

2012· article· en· W7018875134 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBucklingFibre-reinforced plasticStiffnessAdhesiveFinite element methodFailure mode and effects analysisShell (structure)Glass fiber
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An effective technique involving the use of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) plates to enhance the local buckling behaviour of steel plates, beams, and moment resisting frames is presented in this Thesis. The enhancement in buckling capacity is achieved by bonding GFRP plates to the steel sections. These steel/GFRP joints have the advantages of ease of application, low cost, high strength-to-weight ratio, and resistance to corrosion. An interface element that simulates the behaviour of the adhesive bonding the steel and GFRP elements is developed and is implemented into an in-house developed finite element model to represent steel/GFRP joints. The model is based on a powerful nonlinear shell element that is capable of simulating both thin and thick-walled structures. The strength and stiffness of both the GFRP and the adhesive used in the model are based on values obtained from previously conducted tests.\nThe enhancement in buckling capacity of retrofitted steel/GFRP plates is studied by bonding GFRP plates to steel plates having different aspect and slenderness ratios. The study also considers the effect of initial geometric imperfections on both the elastic and inelastic buckling capacities of retrofitted plates. Better improvement in load capacity is predicted for slender steel plates. The strength of the adhesive is shown to play an important role in defining the mode of failure and in determining the capacity of the retrofitted plates.\nThe improvement in buckling behaviour of retrofitted steel/GFRP beams is then studied considering various thicknesses of GFRP plates. The conducted analysis covers a range of slenderness ratios of steel beams and assesses the effect of plastic modulus of steel, initial geometric imperfection, and residual stresses of the steel section on the load-deflection behaviour of steel beams.\nThe lateral behaviour of moment resisting steel frames retrofitted with GFRP plates is studied to assess their capacity improvement in seismic regions. Nonlinear static pushover analyses are carried out for frames retrofitted at their beams’ flanges with different thickness of GFRP plates. The global capacity curves for the retrofitted frames are compared with their corresponding original frames to assess the improvement in seismic performance of the frames.\nFinally, an experimental investigation is carried out to assess the strength and stiffness properties of adhesively bonded steel/GFRP joints under cyclic loading. A number of shear lap tests are conducted and the obtained results are used to determine the characteristics of spring systems that simulate the shear and peel behaviour of the adhesive. Comparison is made between the stiffness and strength capacity under cyclic loading to the corresponding values under monotonic loading.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship@Western (Western University)→Same topicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete→French-language works237,207→