European mental health agenda: future perspectives : Seminar report 16-18 November 2000, Helsinki, Finland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The European Mental Health Agenda: Future Perspectives seminar, which was held in Helsinki on 16-18 November 2000, was the concluding seminar of the projects 'Putting Mental Health on the European Agenda' and 'Establishment of the Indicators for Mental Health Monitoring in Europe'.These projects were financially supported by the European Commission, and were co-ordinated in Finland by the National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health (STAKES) and by the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.The projects can be regarded as important cornerstones of the European Mental Health Agenda, which is an ongoing long-term process with the principal objective of bringing more value and visibility to mental health issues in the public health actions of the EU.Significant progress has been made in the course of the European Mental Health Agenda process.The high-level European Conference on Promotion of Mental Health and Social Inclusion was held in Tampere in October 1999 as part of the official programme of the Finnish Presidency of the EU, and on 18 November 1999, drawing on the conclusions of the conference, the European Council of Health Ministers passed a resolution on the promotion of mental health.Consequently, several European conferences with mental health themes have taken place during the EU Presidencies of Portugal (Health Determinants in the EU, March 2000, and Violence and Promotion of Children's and Young People's Mental Health, June 2000) and of France (Prevention of Youth Suicide, September 2000, and Unemployment and Mental Health, November 2000).The present seminar brought together 60 participants from the EU Member States, the EEA countries, the Applicant Countries, Canada, New Zealand and the USA, and from the European Commission, the European Parliament, intergovernmental organisations (WHO and ILO) and non-governmental organisations (ENUSP, EUFAMI, GAMIAN and MHE).This report reviews the contents of the plenary sessions and the panel discussion, and presents the conclusions of the workshops.This seminar aimed at evaluating the progress made in the two specific projects and at contemplating consequent developments.Draft reports, produced in connection with the projects, were presented for commentaries and discussion.Moreover, the synergy between the European initiatives and several respective developments in Canada, New Zealand and the USA was discussed.The workshops looked at future actions required to further develop and strengthen mental health issues in the context of the European Union and also more globally.Central themes discussed were, for example, priority setting, interdisciplinary action, political commitment, strengthened cooperation, mental health impact assessment, human rights and improved knowledge and information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.016 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.058 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".