MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7019005529

Expanding trade through safe and secure borders : comprehensive report

2003· article· en· W7019005529 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArizona State University Library Digital Repository (Arizona State University) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSandia National LaboratoriesNational Marine Fisheries ServiceCentro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Baja CaliforniaOklahoma Department of TransportationEconomic Research ServiceFederal Motor Carrier Safety AdministrationFederal Highway AdministrationUniversity of Texas at AustinU.S. Consumer Product Safety CommissionU.S. Department of CommerceAmerican Chemistry CouncilU.S. Department of EnergyArizona State UniversityInternational Trade AdministrationCommission for Environmental CooperationColorado Department of TransportationUniversity of ArizonaU.S. Department of AgricultureAnimal and Plant Health Inspection ServiceUnited States Drug Enforcement AdministrationAgricultural Marketing ServiceU.S. Department of TransportationU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyU.S. Department of Homeland Security
KeywordsState (computer science)Border SecurityGovernment (linguistics)Spring (device)Security council
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

abstract: The Nogales CyberPort Project began in the Spring of 2002 amid dramatic changes to the safety and security of U.S. borders. Throughout the following year, extraordinary change was experienced in policy and practice regarding the treatment of the border at the local, state and federal levels. While the movement toward a more efficient and effective border crossing environment has been underway in Arizona and the U.S. for a number of years, there is perhaps a no more appropriate time to undertake the effort to define and implement a CyberPort than right now.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArizona State University Library Digital Repository (Arizona State University)Same topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207