Farmer's access to and perceptions of mass media and mass media study groups : a study of rural communication in the West Lombok Regency - West Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines farmers' access to and perceptions of mass media rural programs and study groups in West Lombok Regency. A questionnaire and in-depth interview were used for data collection. Forty respondents were interviewed, of whom 21 were from study groups and 19 were not members of study groups. Based on the data collected, it was found that television is an important medium for rural communities. One hundred per cent of research respondents had access to television programs, about a quarter had access to radio, and none had regular access to printed media. There is no strong evidence to conclude that group. membership is significantly associated with people's access to rural programs. Group profiles support this statement as they indicate that two of the four selected study groups were inactive. However, the data support the argument that mass media receiver ownership is significantly associated with people's access to rural programs. Results also indicate that there is a positive relationship between people's access intensity to rural programs and their familiarity and perceptions of rural programs. This investigation also reveals that the active study groups were. characterised by their ability to integrate groups' programs. and activities into the existing local communication system, called Yasinan and Arisan. Therefore, findings of this research suggest the need for reconsidering existing values and integrating them into every development approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".