Expeller/cold-pressed canola as a valuable feed ingredient for poultry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The utilization of the expeller/cold-pressing method for producing canola oil from its seeds is becoming increasingly popular. Apart from its relatively high protein content, expeller/cold-pressed canola (ECPC) retains residual oil, making it a valuable protein and energy source for poultry. Unlike the conventional pre-press solvent extraction process, cold pressing does not apply heat or moisture to canola seeds. As a result, the use of different processing technology leads to variation in the chemical composition and nutritive values of ECPC. Therefore, the primary objective of this research was to determine the detailed chemical composition and nutritive profile of twenty-two ECPC samples collected from canola seed expelling facilities in Western Canada. On a dry matter (DM) basis, ECPC contains on average 16.7% of ether extract (EE), 36.5% of crude protein (CP), 24.1% of neutral detergent fibre (NDF), 31.8% of total dietary fibre (TDF), 8.04% of sugars, 6.1% of ash, 1.0% of total P, 0.5% of non-phytate P, and 7.85 µmol/g of glucosinolates (GLS). The AMEn averaged 2386 kcal/kg but ranged from 2128 to 2604 kcal/kg, on a DM basis. Prediction equations for energy availability demonstrated a strong relationship between the fat, CP, ash, and NDF and the AMEn content (R2 = 0.94-0.99; P<0.05). The SIAAD of Lys, Met, Arg, and Thr averaged 85.2%, 93.5%, 88.1%, and 80.4%, respectively, and their standardized ileal digestible content averaged 1.61, 0.45, 1.57, and 1.17% on a DM basis, respectively. There were significant differences between plants in the standardized ileal digestibility of all amino acids except for Thr. Moreover, the significant variations were observed in the standardized ileal digestible content of all amino acids. The results of the growth performance study showed that there were no significant differences in the growth performance of broilers fed ECPC compared to the control treatment when diets were formulated based on digestible amino acid and metabolizable energy contents. Additionally, the developed prediction equations were successfully validated in growth performance study. Expeller/cold-pressed canola; chemical composition; broiler; AMEn; amino acids; growth performance
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".