MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7019133087

An explanation of ice-crushing induced vibrational lock-in using the Molikpaq May 12, 1986 event as a test case

2012· article· en· W7019133087 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTransport Canada
KeywordsSpallSawtooth waveVibrationMode (computer interface)Resonance (particle physics)Spring (device)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ice crushing induced vibration and so-called lock-in behavior exhibited by the Molikpaq structure during a test case event that occurred on May 12, 1986 has been explained in terms of ice spalling, and associated sawtooth load patterns, and resonance of the coupled structure-ice system where the mass and spring constant associated with the ice sheet are variable ‘effective’ quantities that depend on the ice sheet speed. Spalling at the ice edge contact zone plays a key role since the spalling frequency is directly proportional to the speed of the ice sheet towards the structure. Two modes of spalling are described for this particular event. One mode, called system resonant capped (SRC) spalling, causes loading that is similar to classic high-amplitude sawtooth loading and occurs at spalling frequencies in the vicinity of, or less than, the resonant frequency of the structure-ice system. In the present case the SRC spalling appears to be at the system resonant frequency. The other spalling mode is low-amplitude erratic spalling that is characterized by temporal unevenness and unevenness in the magnitude of consecutive load sawteeth. This type of spalling occurs at an average spalling frequency of about 4 Hz, which is substantially higher than the SRC spalling frequency range. For the analysis rough estimates for the variation of the effective mass and effective spring constant of the ice sheet throughout a range of spalling frequency were determined numerically. This treatment predicts that, for ice with similar properties as the May 12 event at least, sawtooth loading of the structure that cause structural oscillations are inevitable when an expansive ice sheet crushes against it. Potential means of significantly reducing the amplitude of the load oscillations by influencing fundamental spalling characteristics using blade-like spall initiators installed on the structure faces at the ice level are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARC→Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→