MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7019233778

Few Lines From Le Robert Crucifère: Botanical, Agronomic And Common Names Relating To Brassica Napus

2018· article· en· W7019233778 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFiVeR (Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Novi Sad, Serbia) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrassicaceaeSinapisCultivarNomenclatureHybridBrassicaMediterranean climateSynonym (taxonomy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The most significant contemporary cultivated species in the family Brassicaceae Burnett (syn. Cruciferae Juss.) is Brassica napus L., which is grown on 33,708,547 ha on a global scale, followed far behind by B.oleracea L. subtaxa and cultivar groups and mustards (Brassica spp. and Sinapis spp.), all together with slightly above 4,5 million ha, in 2016 (FAOSTAT 2017). Its primary centre of diversity is the Mediterranean (Zeven & Zhukovsky 1975), having widespread across the world and becoming most extensively produced in with Canada and China, with almost 18.5 t and more than 15 t, respectively (Chai et al. 2017, Phillips 2018). Resulting from the fusion of the whole genomes of B. oleracea (2n = 9) and B. rapa (2n = 10), B. napus is considered an amphidiploid (Li et al. 2017). A considerable variability of morphological and quality traits may have caused a number of synonyms in various taxonomic classifications, such as B. gongylodes Mill., B. napobrassica Mill., B. oleifera Moench nom. illeg., B. praecox Kit. ex Hornem., B. praecox Waldst. & Kit. ex DC., B. rutabaga DC. ex H.Lév., B. rutabaga (DC.) Druce, B. stricta Nestl. ex DC. or C. napus E. H. L. Krause (The Plant List 2013). The Linnean species name, nāpus (Linnaeus 1753, Linnaeus 1758), is a Latin noun, which is derived from the Ancient Greek nâpu, denoting mustards. The synonym of the latter is sínapi, being, in its own turn, a borrowing of the Demotic snwpt, both referring to the same crops (Erichen 1954, Wiktionary 2018). Since the historical linguistic database of both Egyptian and Proto-Afroasiatic, its direct ancestor that was spoken at most 18,000 years ago, is rather abundant, there are many potential candidates for the ultimate origin of the modern scientific sinapis. One pair is the Egyptian sm.w, designating a cruciferous vegetable, and the Proto-Afroasiatic *sayam, denoting grass, while another is the Egyptian sn.w, associated with a kind of ritual food, and the Proto-Afroasiatic *sVny/’-, referring to seed and corn (Militarev 2005, Militarev & Stolbova 2007). This overview is aimed at presenting the subspecies, varieties, forms, cultivar groups and common names relating to B. napus (Porcher 2008, The Plant List 2013, Wiersema & León 2016, Erić et al. 2017, Kew Science 2017, Logos 2018, NPGS 2018, Wikipedia 2018, Wiktionary 2018).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFiVeR (Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Novi Sad, Serbia)Same topicPlant Ecology and Taxonomy StudiesFrench-language works237,207