MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7019459845

Geochemical interactions between supercritical CO2 and the Midale Formation. I: Introduction to fluid-rock interaction experiments

2002· other· en· W7019459845 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) · 2002
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupercritical fluidLithologyBar (unit)Work (physics)Geochemical modelingHydrothermal circulationRange (aeronautics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report describes work undertaken at the British Geological Survey (BGS) that forms part of the international IEA Weyburn CO2 Monitoring and Storage Project. This project aims to monitor and predict the behaviour of injected CO2 into the Midale reservoir at the Weyburn oil field in southern Saskatchewan, Canada, using methods that include; time-lapse geophysics, modelling its subsurface distribution and migration, and simulating likely chemical interactions with the host rock. This report aims to provide a description of the laboratory experimental techniques that are being applied at the British Geological Survey to investigate the reactions between CO2 and various lithologies within the Midale formation. Later reports will detail the results of these experiments.
\nThe experimental study is being undertaken in the Hydrothermal Laboratory of the BGS, where various measurements are being taken. The techniques that will be used are based upon those used in previous CO2 projects (e.g. during the JouleII CO2 storage project [Holloway, 1996; Czernichowski-Lauriol et al., 1996], and during the SACS project [Rochelle et al., 2002]. This will hopefully allow for better intercomparison between the various studies.
\nThe experiments will utilise actual Midale core material from the Weyburn oil field, together with synthetic formation waters based upon measured compositions of samples at the well-head. The experimental conditions chosen for the investigation cover those representative of in-situ conditions (approximately 60°C, 150 bar [15 MPa]), as well as conditions at the bottom of injection wells where pressures might reach approximately 250 bar [25 MPa]. Experiment durations are planned to range from one week to 6 months. Experiments will be pressurised with either nitrogen or carbon dioxide. The former will provide a ‘non reacting’ reference point from which to compare the more reactive experiments containing CO2. However, it is hoped that they will also help to provide increased confidence in the understanding of the baseline conditions within the Midale formations prior to CO2 injection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.201
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.009
Research integrity0.0000.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council)French-language works237,207