MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7019515900

The Heart of a Mother, The Waves of Mothering: A Narrative Inquiry into Mothering Experiences of Child Weight Management

2022· dissertation· en· W7019515900 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicObesity and Health Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeNarrative inquiryTemporalityMeaning (existential)ConceptualizationIdentity (music)Social workQualitative research
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many stories exist within the professional landscape of child weight management programming and health services. Grand narratives within these spaces story fat bodies as “unhealthy”, “risky” and in need of transformation, and often position the family and mothers in particular given gendered caregiving norms, as responsible for their children’s weight and poor health. Mothering stories and experiences are rarely told by the mothers themselves within this professional landscape. This study is a narrative inquiry that explores the in-depth experiences of two mothers who previously participated with their children in an Ontario paediatric weight management program. Given my work as a social worker within child weight management clinics I also explore my experiences alongside the participants. Clandinin and Connelly’s conceptualization of narrative inquiry and the three dimensional framework of temporality (past, present, future), sociality and place, inquiring inward, outward, backward and forward, were used in order to find meaning in mothering experiences of child weight management. Narrative beginnings share my own experiences of mothering and child weight management. Relational ethics were central as the inquiry unfolded, allowing for simultaneous exploration of experiences, continuous negotiation, awareness and re-evaluation with each mother, from recruitment, field work, to field text, interim text and the writing of the final text. Given the current social distancing restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, conversations took place over zoom and telephone and were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Detailed narrative accounts were written for each mother capturing individual experiences of child weight management as they intersected with many other experiences in their everyday lives. Narrative threads weaved together the mother’s experiences throughout the inquiry and focused on disrupting the grand narrative and resisting fragmentation. The inquiry contributes to the scholarship within fields of social work, social justice, mothering and health care by providing new ways of knowing about and engaging in conversations about mothering, weight, fatness and health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.013
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)→Same topicObesity and Health Practices→French-language works237,207→