IGNÁCZ KÚNOS’UN DERLEDİĞİ TÜRK MASALLARI’NIN PROPP METODUYLA İNCELENMESİ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT \n \nERGÜT, Hatice Meltem. Analiysis of Turkish Tales Compiled of Kunos by Propp Method, Master’s Thesis, Ankara, 2020.\t \n \nOne of the building blocks of a nation is undoubtedly tales. The source of these products, which do not have a national feature, is unclear. However, regardless of the source, societies adapted these products to their own cultural characteristics and they were separated by names such as Turkish tales, Iranian tales, German tales and Russian tales. İt is very sad that tales are one of the types that have lost our narrative tradition today. In the first quarter of the 21st century, it is our duty to revive this species, which has gradually lost its value with the isolation of the individual and to transfer our tales, which are an important part of our culture, from generation to generation, and to adopt our values, traditions, customs and customs. \n \nIt is a fact that it is important to examine the tales in terms of structure in order to identify the common aspects of the tales which are accepted as one of the common values of the nations and to benefit the studies made with this aspect. Using the structuralist approach of Vladimir Propp, one of the classification studies on tales, the tales in Ignacz Kúnos' Ottoman-Turkish Folk Literature Compilation (Oszmán-Török Népköltészet Gyűjteménye) will be examined with the Propp method. The aim is to decode the tales in the book with the Propp method. \n \nThe first part in the anonymous folk literature what the tale is one of, tales studies conducted in Turkey, Ignacz Kúnos's life in the second part, works and contributions to Turkish folk literature, contains information about Propp method in the third section. In the fourth section, episodes and analysis of 98 tales in two volumes will be given. In the fifth chapter, an evaluation of these tales will be made, compiled in 1887 and 1889. Following the bibliography, the translation of the preface of Ignacz Kúnos' Ottoman-Turkish Folk Literature Compilation (Oszmán-Török Népköltészet Gyűjteménye) by Hungarian to Turkish will be given as an additional supplement by Emine ULUTAN. \n \nKeywords: Tale, Propp method, Ignacz Kúnos' compilations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".