Hubungan Antara Dukungan Sosial Terhadap Quarter Life Crisis Di Kota Surakarta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter life crisis is a term used for part of a developmental crisis that occurs during early adulthood with an age range of 18 years – early 30 years. Individuals who are in a quarter life crisis need support from the surrounding environment in order to help deal with the problems that occur. Social support can reduce the psychological pressure experienced by individuals, improve emotional health, and regulate negative emotions that are needed by individuals in dealing with the Quarter life crisis. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between social support and the quarter life crisis. The hypothesis proposed by the researcher is that there is a negative relationship between social support and the Quarter life crisis. The sample in this study was 150 people aged 8 – early 30 years with the subject criteria, namely someone aged 18 – early 30 years 30 years, domiciled in Surakarta City, and willing to fill out the scale. This quantitative research uses measuring instruments in the form of the Quarter life crisis scale and the Social Support Scale. Analysis of the data using the product moment, the results of the data analysis were R = - 0.412 and a significance of 0.00 (p 0.05), so that the Quarter life crisis variable was classified as moderate, while the social support variable was classified as high. The effective contribution given in this study was small at 17%. The results of this study can be used by someone aged 18 - early 30 years in facing a Quarter life crisis by providing social support to other individuals and can be a source of reference for further research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".