Human Umbilical Cord Perivascular Cells: Putative Stromal Cells for Hepatocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Liver failure, which is the result of liver injury and pathological inflammation, is currently only successfully treated by organ transplantation. However donor organ shortages preclude transplantation for many patients in need. Thus, bioartificial liver systems (BALS) are being developed as a bridge to transplantation, or to create an environment conducive to liver regeneration. Hepatocytes, the main functional cells of the liver, are the cells of choice for BALSs, but in standard conditions ex vivo, they rapidly suffer from a reduction of their functionality and viability. Coculture with stromal cells, for example bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSC), has been shown to improve, and extend, hepatocyte function ex vivo up to 21 days. But, only small numbers of BM-MSCs can be harvested from adult volunteers. We have previously described an alternative, more plentiful, source of MSCs — human umbilical cord perivascular cells (HUCPVC) — that are easily expanded and non-alloreactive. Our hypothesis was that HUCPVCs are putative stromal cells for hepatocytes. Our results show that HUCPVCs improved hepatocyte albumin secretion, urea synthesis and maintained hepatocyte cytochrome activity and the expression of hepato-specific genes. Furthermore, there was a net proliferation of hepatocytes, which were polarized in coculture with HUCPVCs, as judged by functional bile canaliculi that were present for up to 40 days. We found that both soluble and non-soluble factors contributed to these effects, while neither was able to allow net proliferation individually. Moreover, HUCPVCs expressed both hepato-trophic and anti-inflammatory factors, at different levels to BM-MSCs, indicating the potential for differential hepato-therapeutics. We conclude that HUCPVCs are putative stromal cells for hepatocytes; they improve hepatocyte functionality, polarity, morphology and net proliferation, and thus present an opportunity for the improvement of both BALS function and liver therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".