Hubungan Antara Regulasi Emosi Dan Dukungan Sosial Dengan Quarter Life Crisis Pada Mahasiswa Psikologi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter life crisis is a transitional period experienced by individuals in early adulthood between Quarter life crisis is a transitional period experienced by individuals in early adulthood between 18-29 years old, characterized by feelings of anxiety about the future, confusion, and social pressure. This condition indicates that students are still vulnerable to psychological stress due to low emotional regulation and lack of social support, thus triggering a crisis in facing early adult developmental tasks. This study aims to determine the relationship between emotional regulation and social support with quarter life crisis in students of the Faculty of Psychology, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. This study uses a quantitative correlational approach using the emotional regulation scale, social support scale, and quarter life crisis scale. Respondents in this study amounted to 230 students of the Faculty of Psychology, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta with age criteria of 18-29 years. The data collection technique in this study used a non-probability sampling technique. Data analysis was tested with multiple linear regression tests. The results of this study indicate that there is a significant relationship between emotional regulation and social support with quarter life crisis, namely with the results of R = 0.370 and a Sig. value of 0.000 (p < 0.01). Then emotional regulation with quarter life crisis r value = 0.297 with Sig 0.000 (p <0.01) which means there is a positive relationship between emotional regulation and quarter life crisis in students of the Faculty of Psychology, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. Then social support with quarter life crisis r value = 0.264 with Sig 0.000 (p <0.01) which means there is a positive relationship between social support and quarter life crisis in students of the Faculty of Psychology, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. The effective contribution of independent variables in this study was 13.7% simultaneously. With partial details, the emotional regulation variable influenced the quarter life crisis variable by 7.97% while social support influenced the quarter life crisis variable by 5.73%, while 86.3% was influenced by other variables
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".