MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7019871246

The influence of steroid and peptide hormones on cognition and mood during late pregnancy and early postpartum

2012· dissertation· en· W7019871246 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2012
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsPregnancyMoodPostpartum periodRecallCognitionHormoneProlactinAffect (linguistics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cognitive and mood changes during pregnancy and postpartum have been subjectively reported by women and have also been objectively measured. However, evidence relating to the relationship between hormone levels and these changes is sparse and contradictory. The studies presented in this thesis were undertaken to investigate the possible influence of estradiol (E2), progesterone (P), testosterone (T), cortisol (CORT) and prolactin (PRL) levels on cognitive functioning and mood during late pregnancy and the early postpartum period. In Study 1, pregnant women were tested on a battery of neuropsychological tests once during late pregnancy and once during the early postpartum period and their scores were compared to non-pregnant controls. Results showed that the pregnancy group had significantly lower scores than the controls on tasks of verbal recall and processing speed both during the pregnancy and the postpartum test times. CORT levels were significantly associated, in an inverted-U function, with verbal recall scores during pregnancy and postpartum and with spatial abilities at postpartum. During pregnancy, negative linear associations were observed between PRL and executive function and paragraph recall scores along with an inverted-U association with paragraph recall scores. At postpartum, E2 and CORT were negatively associated, in a linear fashion, with attention scores. In Study 2, linear and non-linear associations between hormones and mood during pregnancy and postpartum were investigated while taking into consideration psychosocial factors previously found to be related to mood changes during these reproductive periods. Perceived stress, social support from friends, social support from a significant other and sleep were found to be significant predictors of mood scores. During pregnancy, a small positive linear correlation was obtained between levels of PRL and lower mood scores. At the postpartum visit, moderate U-shaped correlations were found between mood disturbances and level of E2 and P while smaller increases in the Cortisol Awakening Response were associated with poorer mood. Collectively, the present studies provide new evidence that aspects of cognitive function and mood are altered during pregnancy and the postpartum periods and may be modulated, at least in part, by hormonal and psychosocial factors during these reproductive events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum→French-language works237,207→