MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7020010507

Is intrauterine growth influenced by the season of birth?

2015· dissertation· en· W7020010507 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Thessaly Institutional Repository (University of Thessaly) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman Colonialism and Identity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)GestationIn uteroSeason of birthBirth weightMultivariate analysisAnalysis of variance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been established that retarded growth in utero [as assessed through birthweight\n(BW)] predicts the onset of many chronic diseases in adulthood and affects longevity.\nThe objective of the present study was to examine the hypothesis that intrauterine\ngrowth is also influenced by the season of birth. To test our conjecture we used BW\nand Gestation Age (GA) data from the Birth and Death Registry of Athens. The\nsample consisted of 516.874 infants (M: 266.579; F: 250.295) bom from 1980 to\n2005 in Greece. Males demonstrated greater BW, compared to females [3264.891gr\nvs. 3137.416gr], Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) detected significant\neffects of both gender and birth quarter on GA and BW. Males bom in the first\nquarter of the year (Ql) demonstrated significantly greater BW and GA, compared to\ninfants bom in the other quarters of the year [Ql=3283.09gr, 38.56weeks;\nQ2=3256.91gr, 38.51 weeks; Q3=3258.45gr, 38.48weeks; Q4=3261.1 lgr,\n38.48weeks; (pO.OOl)]. Results in females demonstrated a similar significant\ntendency [Ql=3155.63gr, 38.58weeks; Q2=3127.45gr, 38.52weeks; Q3=3132.17gr,\n38.50weeks; Q4=3134.41gr, 38.50weeks; (pO.OOl)]. A chi-square test was then\nconducted to find in which quarter of the year the lowest number of cases of Low\nBirth Weight (LBW) infants was observed and found that the lowest number of cases\nof LBW babies was observed for babies bom in the first quarter of the year, and the\nhighest in the third quarter [Ql=8981; Q2=9748; Q3=10894; Q4=10420; (pO.OOl)].\nAccording to these findings, babies (males & females) bom in the first quarter of the\nyear are significantly heavier, have longer gestation ages and have significantly less\nrisk of being bom with a LBW than babies bom in the other quarters of the year.\nIt is concluded that the season of birth influences significantly BW and WG, possibly\ndue to environmental - climatical conditions, the quality and quantity of nutrition\nreceived in utero and also the amount of bright sunshine the pregnant mother is\nexposed to.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.416
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it