La construction identitaire d'une exilée volontaire - parcours à travers les langues et les discours -
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study addresses issues of identity construction and processes of personal and ideological transformation through the experience of migration and contact with languages. I examine several questions such as the emergence of author's voice, language and power, migrantsf hybridity, and writing as locations for negotiating multiple identities. More specifically, I analyze my own situation as a multilingual French person in exile and my return to French writing in an Anglophone context (Vancouver, British Columbia). The theoretical framework of the study is based on socio-constructivist concepts linked to identity, language and writing. I adopt a view of identity that considers the multiplicity of subject positions, the relationship to the Other in socially unequal contexts and the fluid nature of identity construction. I examine how a person constructs new mixed identities in a linguistic minority context and in exile, and how they are expressed in the writing process. The study of my linguistic origins, as well as of the status of the French language and minority languages in France and in Canada reveals the challenges of maintaining a language in a minority context. The methodology used in this research consists of writing and interpreting autobiographical narratives and poetry. These texts reveal themes such as challenges linked to exile, tension amongst languages, multiplicity of voices and the emergence of a creative plural space. This research fostered a personal and ideological awareness in regard to linguistic richness and brought to light pedagogical implications linked to multiple identities in school settings. It provides a forum for extended reflection on languages in minority contexts and pluri1:ingualism in our contemporary societies. It also opens avenues for further exploration of identity construction and inclusion of linguistic diversity in classrooms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".