MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7020031623

Integration of sediment fingerprinting techniques and sampling approaches within a prairie watershed in southern Alberta

2018· dissertation· en· W7020031623 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil erosion and sediment transport
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSampling (signal processing)WatershedErosionChannel (broadcasting)Hydrology (agriculture)Water quality
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soil erosion can cause sedimentation and eutrophication of waterbodies, which can decrease the quality of water. This study took place in southern Alberta within the Lower Little Bow River (LLBR) watershed, which has been a source of water quality studies as a part of the Oldman River Basin Water Quality Initiative. The objectives of this study were, firstly, to identify and apportion sources of suspended sediment using a sediment fingerprinting technique and the mixing model, MixSIAR, within a small 6-km reach of the LLBR, secondly, to build a better understanding of colour properties as tracers, and thirdly, to explore the effect of reach sampling within using the MixSIAR model. The first objective was accomplished through the sampling of multiple watershed sources including Agricultural Land, Coulee Walls, Stream Banks, an Irrigation Return-Flow channel and Upstream sediment. Suspended sediment was collected within the reach itself and un-mixed to determine source proportions contributed by each of the five potential sediment sources. The second objective was accomplished by taking three approaches in order to determine the appropriate environmental tracer combination to apportion sources accurately and how these affect choosing appropriate environmental tracers for sediment fingerprinting. The third objective of this thesis was accomplished by determining the composition and incorporation of upstream inflowing sediment into a watershed reach when conducting a sediment fingerprinting study. The mixing model, MixSIAR, was used as a tool to manipulate the watershed in order to determine how to improve the efficiency of the sediment fingerprinting process regarding tracer selection and sampling approaches. The MixSIAR model is used as a tool to determine how to design an approach to a reach within a watershed and the significance of upstream inflowing sediment inclusion as a sediment source.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicSoil erosion and sediment transportFrench-language works237,207