MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7020066137

Is the dream still alive? Tracking homeownership amid
\nchanging economic and demographic conditions

2018· dissertation· en· W7020066137 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing Market and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDebtUnemploymentCensusHousehold debtRecessionUnemployment rateQuarter (Canadian coin)LoanEconomic indicator
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The United States (U.S.) is undergoing three major trends, which are converging and changing the housing market. The first trend is housing inventory is constrained in much of the U.S. As a result, home prices have increased to an inflation‐adjusted 49 percent from 2012 to 2017 (National Association of Realtors 2018b) and has become out of reach for many Americans as incomes have risen 14 percent in the same timeframe (U.S. Census Bureau 2018a). The second trend is the homeownership rate for those under the age of 35, Black/African American, and Hispanic/Latino adults has not rebounded since the Great Recession in the United States (U.S.). The third trend is the amount of student loan debt in the U.S. has increased about 70 percent from 2007 to 2017 (Chakrabarti et al. 2017) and is concentrated among those under the age of 35, Black/African Americans, and Hispanic/Latinos. This thesis explores the intersection of these trends through the application of quantitative and qualitative analysis. Through a Two‐Stage Least Squares econometric approach, those with student debt, Black/African American, and Hispanic/Latino buyers purchase a lower priced home, even while controlling household income and home size purchased. These three populations are most at risk to be impacted by the reduction in housing inventory, increased home prices, and the increase in student loan debt. As these three populations face limited affordable housing inventory and student debt increases, the homeownership rate has declined. To understand how local economic and demographic factors play a role, the days on market, unemployment rate, the share of those over the age of 65, and share of those with Bachelor’s degrees within the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) are added into the model. Results from the econometrics are triangulated through focus groups conducted in cities across the U.S. Focus groups explored themes that were not able to be understood through econometrics, such as the idea that individuals may prefer to rent. The thesis contains policy recommendations based on the findings from the econometrics and focus groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository)Same topicHousing Market and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207