La biblioteca integrada. Un modelo de cooperación entre bibliotecas públicas y otras unidades de información
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cooperation between public libraries and school libraries is an alternative library model, capable of effectively rendering library services in the 21st century. The progress made in the last years of school libraries of our country, promoted by various administrations, opens a new horizon for public libraries in their challenge to develop their educational function. Dual use libraries or joint use library is a cooperative formula more than one hundred years old, with its advantages and disadvantages, it works successfully in countries like United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, United Kingdom, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Latvia and Portugal, both in rural populations and in cities with more than one million inhabitants. From the study of the meaning of the concept, various definitions and the bibliometric analysis of different terminology used in the international professional literature, the use of the term "joint use library" is proposed, instead of "double use libraries", to refer in Spanish this form of cooperation established between public libraries and specialized libraries, considering that it is the most appropriate translation and because it includes the cooperation modalities established between more than two information units (public library with libraries of colleges, institutes, universities, museums, companies, archives and other local institutions). A joint use Library Observatory is created with the purpose of establishing a channel for discussion and debate, open to all professionals and entities, to collect this type of vicissitudes and discuss other aspects that affect the development or rejection of this form of library cooperation in which the public library exercises a fundamental role.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.013 | 0.024 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.034 | 0.029 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".