MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7020118452

Irish Law 2002: An Insider's Guide to Notre Dame Law School

2002· article· en· W7020118452 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicArtificial Intelligence Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIndiana University BloomingtonUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignOhio Wesleyan UniversityCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityIllinois Wesleyan UniversityLoyola Marymount UniversityNorth Carolina Central UniversityMarquette UniversityStonehill CollegeGrinnell CollegeLong Island UniversityGrove City CollegePepperdine UniversitySt. Olaf CollegeTruman State UniversitySaint Louis UniversityKent State UniversityRhodes CollegeEastern Illinois UniversityFordham UniversityMcMaster UniversityNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of South FloridaUniversity of Notre DameWellesley CollegeWestern Michigan UniversityUniversity of CincinnatiGeorgetown UniversityNorthwestern UniversityUniversity of Central FloridaSouthern Methodist UniversityTulane UniversityUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLouisiana State UniversityUniversity of OklahomaDrexel UniversityWashington State UniversityUniversity of DaytonMichigan State UniversityUniversity of OregonH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research InstituteVillanova UniversityUniversity of KansasOhio State UniversityWake Forest UniversityIowa State UniversityUniversity of WashingtonNorth Carolina State UniversityTexas Tech UniversityU.S. Naval AcademyHarvard UniversityUniversity of MiamiUniversity of MissouriPomona CollegeUniversity of PittsburghSyracuse UniversityGeorge Washington UniversityRice UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityState University of New YorkPrinceton UniversityDartmouth CollegeFlorida State UniversityPurdue UniversityFort Lewis CollegeYale UniversityPitzer CollegeVanderbilt UniversitySanta Clara UniversityJohn Carroll UniversityWilliams CollegeUniversity of Minnesota
KeywordsTreasureIrishPublicationPublishingClass (philosophy)Legal education
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Notre Dame Law School Class of 2005: Welcome to Notre Dame Law School! We are pleased to be among the first students to welcome you to our community. If you are anything like we were just a few years ago, you probably have plenty of questions about law school, Notre Dame and South Bend. We hope that this guide will give you answers to many of your questions and gives a window into what life at Notre Dame is like. This is an insider's guide because it was written entirely by students. A group of about fifteen of us volunteered to collect information and reflect on our experiences to publish this guide. We think we've compiled a lot of information that will make your transition to law school at Notre Dame easier, and your first months on campus more fun. Even though this is not meant to be a comprehensive guide to everything you need to know to get through law school, we think that it may be a pretty good place to start. So whether you are trying to figure out where to live next year, what is the best way to get to South Bend, where to find a good Italian restaurant, or what law students do on the weekend, this guide should answer many of your questions. More importantly, we think this guide should answer questions about what life at Notre Dame Law School is like. We have both come to treasure our experiences at NDLS. The professors, students, and staff of this law school are unique-their warmth, friendship and flair has made studying law at Notre Dame fun and, undoubtedly, has provided us with a better foundation for us to successfully achieve both our personal and professional goals. We hope that our enthusiasm, and that of other students, will be apparent throughout this guide. Although we know that you have already been inundated with information from the Law School and from the University, we hope that this guide will be valuable as you prepare for classes in August. Once again, welcome. Enjoy the remaining months before you begin law school, and we look forward to seeing you in August. Best wishes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.331
Threshold uncertainty score0.954

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3310.315

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207