Leeds, Grenville, Lanark, & Renfrew county directory, with the names of the principal inhabitants of upwards of seventy towns and villages, including the recent settlements on the crown lands, and a variety of useful local information, for the year 1859 ; together with a farmer's almanack and diary with hints a receipts adapted to the exigencies of the Canadian settler.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This first attempt at a cheap and popular Directory, it is hoped, will be received with every owance for partial inaccuracy.Every effort, that time and opportunity would permit, has been kde to produce a correct publication that would form some clue to the condition of the Section of inada embraced.The object being two-fold, viz : to serve the local Commerce and Trade of the ction -and next, to satisfy those at a distance and Emigrants in particular, that however this ction of the Country may hitherto h:ive been passed over in the general rush to the West, yet there no portion of the Province, which at this moment is in a more prosperous condition than that em- aced by the United Counties of Leeds and Grenville, and Lanark and Renfrew.The latter em- aces the whole of the Upper Oltawa District, to which, of late, Emigration has been mainly rected.This work will go free by post to any part of the Province for a few cents above the pub- hed price, and for the small sum of 7^d. to any part ofGreatBritain.With all its imperfections ere is, as yet, no work which can give the intending Emigrant half so much information as a local irectory, specifying all the Trades carried on, and the Religious and Educational Provision made for Inhabitants.The success of this work mainly depends upon general circulation, independently of \\ support, and to this the attention of the public is urgently invited-in the hope that those who 'ly think it cheap at Is. 3d. may be induced to distribute copies amongst absent friends both in out of the Province -both at home and abroad.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.467 | 0.264 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".