MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7020316286

La Responsabilita' del vettore nel trasporto di persone e nel turismo organizzato

2015· article· it· W7020316286 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Theses and Dissertations Repository (University of Pisa) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Aviation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDanceDesertionHappening
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Con il contratto di trasporto un soggetto, denominato vettore, si obbliga dietro corrispettivo a trasferire cose o persone da un luogo ad un altro, ed al tempo stesso a vigilare sulla loro incolumità. Sebbene i contratti di trasporto della navigazione si inquadrino nella figura di trasporto di diritto generale, il codice della navigazione distingue tra trasporto marittimo e trasporto aereo. Per quanto riguarda il trasporto aereo, il codice della navigazione rimanda alla Convenzione di Montreal del 1999 in tema di responsabilità per morte o lesioni al passeggero, avaria o distruzione del bagaglio e ritardo, non comprendendo però le ipotesi della cancellazione del volo e l’overbooking, in quanto disciplinate a livello comunitario. In ambito marittimo, la responsabilità vettoriale è regolata dal codice della navigazione, unitamente alla Convenzione di Atene del 1974, emendata dal Protocollo di Londra del 2002. Infine, accanto al contratto di passaggio, partire dagli anni 70, il legislatore internazionale ha iniziato a disciplinare il nuovo fenomeno dei pacchetti turistici all- inclusive e la conseguente tipizzazione del contratto di viaggio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronic Theses and Dissertations Repository (University of Pisa)Same topicInternational Law and AviationFrench-language works237,207