MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7020404931

Lamar County, Texas (41LR2), GTW-535 [TX 148/1]

2020· article· en· W7020404931 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIndex of Texas Archaeology Open Access Grey Literature from the Lone Star State · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEngravingNova scotiaSquare (algebra)Smooth surfaceLine (geometry)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SITE NAME OR SITE NUMBER: George T. Wright Collection, Lamar County, Texas. Wright’s notebook indicates this vessel came from a burial at the Sanders site (41LR2), near but not from either of the two mounds at the site (Jackson et al. 2000; Krieger 1946). VESSEL NO.: GTW-535 [TX 148/1], Burial Lamar VESSEL FORM: Bowl with four lip appliqued lugs NON-PLASTICS AND PASTE: grog RIM AND LIP FORM: Inverted rim and rounded lip CORE COLOR: G (fired in a reducing environment and cooled in the open air) INTERIOR SURFACE COLOR: dark grayish-brown EXTERIOR SURFACE COLOR: reddish-brown; fire clouds on the body WALL THICKNESS (IN MM): rim, 7.6 mm INTERIOR SURFACE TREATMENT: smoothed EXTERIOR SURFACE TREATMENT: burnished HEIGHT (IN CM): 10.2 ORIFICE DIAMETER (IN CM): 12.5 DIAMETER AT BOTTOM OF RIM OR NECK (IN CM): 12.3 BASE DIAMETER (IN CM) AND SHAPE OF BASE: 5.2 cm, circular and flat ESTIMATED VOLUME (IN LITERS): 0.6 DECORATION (INCLUDING MOTIF AND ELEMENTS WHEN APPARENT): the rim panel has four sets of vertical and diagonal engraved lines as well as a single horizontal engraved line at the base of the rim panel. The appliqued lugs divide the engraved sets. PIGMENT USE AND LOCATION ON VESSEL: none TYPE AND VARIETY (IF KNOWN): Sanders Engraved (see Suhm and Jelks 1962:137 and Plate 69) Sanders Engraved bowl, GTW-535.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.549
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0080.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndex of Texas Archaeology Open Access Grey Literature from the Lone Star StateSame topicArchaeology and Natural HistoryFrench-language works237,207