La traducción jurídica: la traducción de Canada´s system of justice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En la actualidad, las familias jurídicas más relevantes del mundo occidental son el derecho anglosajón y el derecho continental. Entre los países que se rigen por el derecho anglosajón se encuentra Canadá, país que será objeto de estudio en el presente Trabajo de Fin de Grado (TFG). En primer lugar, abordaremos los aspectos teóricos más relevantes relacionados con la traducción general y la especializada para, más adelante, profundizar en el concepto de traducción jurídica y el lenguaje jurídico tanto inglés como español. Asimismo, describiremos brevemente los sistemas jurídicos de Canadá y España. A continuación, presentaremos la traducción de un documento oficial titulado Canada’s System of Justice que fue publicado por el Departamento de Justicia de Canadá. Posteriormente, se llevará a cabo un análisis terminológico contrastivo aplicado al sistema jurídico canadiense y español. Por último, se presentarán las conclusiones obtenidas del trabajo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".