L'assetto costituzionale delle autonomie canadesi alla luce della Patriation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canada represents the real and just experimental place to determine the balance of governance arrangements between federal and local forces that is not always possible to transcribe in the formal Constitution. In this Country autonomist claims are entwined with the deep need to maintain national unity at different levels. At first glance it seems impossible that these two trends can coexist. This multifaceted society seems to be condemned to continue a slow integration process without achieving it. This process represents in some ways the real essence of the nation. It consists in a sort of infinite exodus to a promise land that many are resigned they will never see, a “Constitutional Odissey” that even the Supreme Court could not finalise despite the multiple interventions requested by local and federal political forces. Il Canada rappresenta un vero e proprio laboratorio di sperimentazione per la determinazione degli equilibri negli assetti di governo tra potere federale e autonomie locali che non sempre è stato possibile trascrivere nella Costituzione formale. In questo Paese si intersecano, su piani differenziati, istanze autonomistiche e l’esigenza profonda di mantenere l’unità nazionale che ad un primo sguardo sembrerebbe impossibile da conciliare. Eppure questa multiforme società, sembra quasi condannata a proseguire, senza mai raggiungerlo, un lento processo di integrazione che per certi versi rappresenta l’essenza stessa della nazione, una sorta di Esodo infinito verso una terra promessa che in molti sembrano essere rassegnati a non vedere mai; una «odissea costituzionale» che la stessa Suprema Corte non è riuscita a concludere nonostante i plurimi interventi richiesti dalla politica locale e federale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".