Meningkatkan hasil belajar dan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa kelas VIII B SMP Kanisius Kalasan Sleman Yogyakarta pada materi ``Sistem Pencernaan Manusia`` melalui metode PQ4R
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to know how far the PQ4R method, increases the student's learning performance and their ability to think critically on human digestion systems subject.The research chooses as its target group the student of Kanisius Kalasan Yogyakarta Junior High School grade VIII B, 2012VIII B, -2013 periods.The data were collected from the evaluation of pre-test, post-test, observation sheet, and student worksheet.This research used Sanford and Kemmis method consisting of stages: planning, action, observation, evaluation, and reflection that was applied repeatedly until reaching the desired result and quality.Based on the result of this research, it can be concluded that PQ4R method could increase the student's learning performance and the ability to think critically.The student's learning performance of the Kanisius Kalasan Yogyakarta Junior High School student grade VIII B has reached the research indicator.It showed that 60% of the student got score over 70, the standard score.The learning performance of the cognitive aspect showed the percentage increase of students who performed over the passing grade.In the second cycle (cycle two), 67,57% of the students reached the standard score.This percentage is higher than pre-test (29,72 %) and post-test (5,41 %) percentage.Affective aspect of learning performance in the second cycle classically has reached 76,67 %, which is higher 15% than the first cycle.In the second cycle, the psycomototric aspect of learning performance showed the improvement which is show by 73% of the students who had been actively participating in the class.Method PQ4R also showed improvement of student's criticism since the student learning performance reached 67,57% in the second cycle which means 32, 43% increase from the pretest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.330 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it