MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7020843973

Morgantown MSA Economic Monitor March 2006

2006· article· en· W7020843973 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Issues and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)West virginiaMetropolitan areaIndex (typography)Cost of livingPhoneSquare (algebra)Consumer price index (South Africa)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cost of living for a professional household in Morgantown is on par with a selection of the nation's urban areas, according to the ACCRA Cost of Living Index.Morgantown was the 76th most expensive place to live among the 298 urban areas that participated in the survey during the forth quarter of 2005.The ACCRA Cost of Living Index reflects the cost differentials for the standard of living present in a professional or managerial household in the top income quintile found in urban areas throughout the U.S. and Canada.These differentials are estimated through more than 50,000 prices covering almost 60 different goods and services for which prices are collected.ACCRA, a professional association of community and economic development researchers, compiles these prices and publishes the Cost of Living Index on a quarterly basis.The Bureau of Business and Economic Research conducted the price survey in conjunction with ACCRA by canvassing Morgantown area businesses.ACCRA calculates the index through a weighting structure.For instance, grocery items carry a weight of 13 percent of the total while housing and health care items carry a weight of 29 and 4 percent respectively.The average for all areas participating in the cost of living survey is 100 and each city's index is interpreted compared to the average for all places.An index below 100 means that an area's cost of living is less than average and an index number above 100 means that it is above average.Morgantown's cost for a professional/managerial household's standard of living was 1.1 percent above the average in the fourth quarter of 2005.In comparison to other participating local urban areas (Charleston, Martinsburg, and Pittsburgh), Morgantown was the highest priced due to housing, utilities, and health care costs, as demonstrated in Figure 1 below.When comparing Morgantown, which is home to West Virginia University, to other Big East Conference university cities, Morgantown's cost of living comes in slightly higher.Syracuse, New York, which registered a composite index of 100.4,came the closest to the national average and to Morgantown's cost of living.The newest universities to the Big East Conference, Cincinnati, Louisville, and South Florida, all came in with lower total index levels.In fact, Cincinnati came in with the lowest at 7 percent below the national average of participating areas and 8.1 percent below Morgantown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1090.075

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University)Same topicSocial Issues and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207