Mikið álag en stórkostleg upplifun, Upplifun feðra af föðurhlutverkinu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There have not been many studies in Iceland on how fathers cope in their fatherhood, there for was it necessary in our opinion to make a further study on this matter. Purpose:The purpose of this study was to see how fathers are copying in the fathers role concerning, pressure, responsibility, mental health, education to the fathers, attitude toward breastfeeding and their taking maternity leave. Methods:The study was based qualitative research by Vancouver-school in phenomenal studies.We used in our study purpose sample were we took interviews with ten fathers between 20-40 years that had child/children between the age sex months and four years old.The interviews were taken between 29 th of February and 13 th of March 2008, each interview was recorded and later written and copied down and analysed according to Vancouver-school into the major-, main-and sub theme. Conclusion:Our main conclusion of this study revealed that fathers are enjoying great pleasure regarding the fatherhood.They also experience great responsibility and some of them informed us that their anxiety of becoming a parent did not necessarily show mental discomfort more over the importance of the role they were taken op on.The fathers were mostly happy about the education they received before the birth of their child, but they wanted further education after the birth, regarding general information about how to take care of the child.When the conclusion of the research is analysed we saw that increase in information after the birth of the child is necessary and take in to consideration the fathers needs and aspect.The researchers hope that the study will open op the conversation of these matters and cast the light on how fathers are copying with their role as fathers and also helps health staff to see if the fathers are properly taken care of during the process of becoming a fathers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.028 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".