MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7020983807

Modeling and management of potential movement for elk (Cervus elaphus), bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) and grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) in the Radium Hot Springs S area, British Columbia

2001· article· en· W7020983807 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of EnvironmentParks CanadaUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsNational parkHabitatWildlifeGrizzly BearsRecreationWildlife managementOvis canadensisUrsus
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I delineated potential movement corridors for elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni), bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis canadensis) and grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) using a GIS-based modeling approach. This approach incorporated current modeling techniques complemented by site-specific knowledge of wildlife use acquired through an extensive review of the literature, key informant interviews and personal observations in the field. My analysis led to the identification of 18 potential corridors for elk and/or grizzly bear and 12 potential corridors for bighorn sheep. Three corridors stand out as being particularly important for ensuring connectivity on a regional scale, for multiple species. The Upper Luxor Creek Corridor provides the only low elevation, forested linkage between the Kootenay and Columbia drainages within the study area that is relatively secure from human disturbance. The Upper Benchlands Corridor offers a high quality corridor for movements along the Columbia Valley and, because of its width and gentle topography, is probably suitable for a wide variety of species. This corridor is of particular significance because it provides a safe route for animals traveling between the Columbia Valley and Kootenay National Park via the Lower Sinclair Creek Corridor. The Lower Sinclair Creek Corridor represents another important low-elevation forested linkage between the Columbia and Kootenay Valleys. Empirical data and anecdotal observations demonstrate movement of bighorn sheep, elk, wolf and cougar through this corridor. The main issues threatening habitat connectivity in the Radium area are increasing recreational and residential development, blockage of movement and mortality associated with transportation corridors, and a lack of coordinated regional planning. General recommendations aimed at preserving a functional network of corridors across the greater Radium landscape include the formation of a sub-regional ecosystem advisory committee, the formation of a sustainable economy committee, the establishment of an inter-jurisdictional wildlife database and more extensive monitoring of wildlife movements. I also provide specific recommendations relating to each of the focal species as well as to each potential corridor identified. Recommendations for future research and management are also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicWildlife-Road Interactions and ConservationFrench-language works237,207