Bibliographic record
Abstract
[4] Last August I took my wife and little girl to the snow line and camped there several days. Camp of the clouds last August was nearly a mile away from the snow line, so light had been the snowfall the previous winter, and so great last summer's heat. I took my little daughter up nearly to our camp below "Goat Pillar," and would have taken her quite to it, only a recent fall of snow (3 inches) we had been travelling through for half a mile began to make her little feet cold. Quite a climb for a little 9-year old, wasn't it? From our highest point we could see two climbers nearing the summit of the mountain, who had started in the morning. One was a member of the Alpine club of Oregon and the other a Tacoma gentleman. [1] Yelm, Wash, June 18-90 John Muir, Martinez, Cal. Dear sir: Many, many thanks for the two elegant numbers of "Picturesque California, Oregon Washington" etc. I should have long ere this written thanking your for the same, but business calling me from home several times since their receipt delayed my letter till this time. I loaned the numbers to the editor of the Tacoma Ledger to read. In a recent number of his paper your very interesting account of our ascent of the grand old mountain appears. [5] They reached the top between 4 and 5 o'clock, and had to stay all night in the crater. The next day they looked the worse for their [dreary?] vigil on the summit. Like other [tyros?], I think they thought to make the trip from lower snowline and back the same day I see by the papers you are contemplating soon another exploring trip to Alaska. Is there any chance of your coming this way? If you do come this route you must not fail to make me a visit. As if I knew that you would touch at some point on the Sound I would be there to see you if possible. If it wasn't for the sea voyage one has to endure (and a sea voyage nearly kills me) to reach that
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.841 | 0.765 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".