MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7021997855

Page 2

2008· article· en· W7021997855 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Robotics and Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeavenSketchAdventureSeriousnessLuckExposition (narrative)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[2]<br><br>Alaska, the adventure on the glacier when the buzzards were looking for you, the Salmon Stories and lots of serious and humorous experience, in short a sort of "Camp-fire talk," even bringing in your "John the Divine" story as sauce to scientific meat This would make a readable mixture of grave and gay. Your memory is chockful of interesting reminiscences of scentific men of [humor?] Dr. John Hall (!) & others which would be interesting and would relieve the seriousness of the purely scientific material. Will you just save the plums for the Century. And by the way have you anything interesting to say of the Klondike? If so, now is your time.<br>Remember that I shall said for London August 21" and let me have a word about this before I leave--or if that isn't possible wirte Mr. Gilder afterward. I suppose you are with Prof. Sargent by this time If so remember me to him cordially.<br><br>[3] (Muir 2)<br><br>[letterhead]<br><br>Why not sit down on receipt of this & sketch out two or three papers of these notes, and see how the thing would look? Could you make one or two Yukon region alone? If so, do it at once.<br>Wasn't the "Alaska Trip" a timely hit, appearing on the very heels of the gold excitement? Heaven favors the virtuous.<br>The Atlantic paper is good & I hear people speak of it. but dont let Page allure you away from your first love.<br>See how we advertise you always as the author of "The Mountains of California".<br><br>02323<br><br>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducational Robotics and EngineeringFrench-language works237,207