Bibliographic record
Abstract
A user needs analysis is a process whereby needs are identified and priorities among them established.The user needs analysis is required in order to evaluate the library's reference services, database training opportunities, and collection development decisions.The project would involve initial research into the process of needs assessment and analysis, particularly in a library setting.The development of a needs assessment questionnaire (online/electronic and mailout).The administration of said questionnaire to members of UHN's Multi Organ Transplant Program.Identification of needs and an analysis of the results, including recommendations for targetted library services for this user group. About the Multi Organ Transplant Program:As the largest transplant program in Canada, the Multi Organ Transplant Program provides a broad spectrum of services currently encompassing heart, lung, liver, kidney and pancreas transplantation as well as highly successful living donor transplant programs.Transplant patients from all organ groups benefit from our team of multidisciplinary health care professionals, most of whom specialize in the field of transplantation, and work exclusively within the Multi Organ Transplant Program.In addition to medicine and nursing, the program currently includes professionals from the following allied health professions: psychiatry, social work, nutrition,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.682 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".