Obravnava rupture dvoglave nadlaktne mišice v delovni terapiji: študija primera
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Distal biceps brachii tear is a relatively rare injury.The causes of biceps brachii tears may be due to a variety of factors, including sudden forceful extension of the elbow, chronic overuse or degenerative changes in the tendon.Symptoms include sudden pain and weakness in the affected arm, accompanied by a tearing sensation, swelling and bruising, and the patient may have a visible deformity.Operative and non-operative approaches to treatment are available.Occupational therapy plays an important role in the rehabilitation process after surgery for distal biceps tear.The occupational therapist develops an individualised plan that focuses on interventions aimed at the client's independent, safe and efficient performance of basic and instrumental activities of daily living.The user is advised to adapt their work and home environment for a safe and successful recovery.Based on the user's assessment results in the areas of body structure and function, the occupational therapist integrates therapeutic activities to improve the user's range of movement, muscle strength and function.Purpose: The purpose of this thesis is to present the occupational therapy intervention of a person with a distal biceps tendon injury after surgery, using the AOTA process in occupational therapy.Methods.A case study involving one user was carried out.The treatment was carried out individually, in the home environment, over a period of six weeks, five days a week, for 30-45 minutes a day.It covered daily therapeutic activities in the area of self-care and broader daily activities at the level of activity and occupation.It focused on restoring lost hand skills and function, strength training and adapting activities to enable the user to perform and become more independent.Results: In the final evaluation of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, there was an improvement in the results of the self-assessment of implementation and satisfaction.In the final evaluation of the Activity Analysis by Skill, there was an improvement in scores for all motor and procedural skills that were outliers in the initial evaluation.At the end of the intervention, the user performs the activity safely, independently, efficiently and without physical effort.Discussion and Conclusion: Interventions supporting occupation and strength training proved to be effective in occupational therapy intervention that followed the American practice framework.During the rehabilitation, we started from the user and his/her problems.The user demonstrated independent and safe performance of all the activities discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".