O canto dos cisnes : análise do pensamento sobre a crise do Nordeste nos Anais do Congresso Agrícola do Recife, 1878
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In an attempt to accompany the new dynamic world, arising from the socalled "Second Industrial Revolution", the State Imperial Brazil, during the second half of the nineteenth century, has undertaken an agenda of key reforms for development the country. Positioning it self regarding this agenda and in order to draw the attention of the Imperial govemment to the problems of the region's sugar agribusiness, the elite Northeast - farmers, traders, intellectuals - called the Congress of Agricultural Recife (1878). In this dissertation, we will use as the main source Annals of Congress and examine the positioning of its participants regarding issues of Brazilian history - especially in the Northeast - and world of the last quarter of the nineteenth century. The intention is to show the intemal debate of the elite northeastem about the various measures suggested to overcome the crisis and prosperity of the region, among which we can enumerate: vocational education; laws to combat vadiagem and crime as a way of recruiting men for poor free and the activities of agribusiness; employment; European immigration, farm equipment; roads iron; central devices; mortgage; reforms No imperial political system; reforms in the tax system, etc.. For methodological procedures, which the sinuosidades and confrontations between the congressmen, the analysis covers the plans: textual - each speech has an intemal dimension, a structure and an own logic - and intertextual - builds up a dialogue between the main source (the Annals) and other bibliographical workmanships and documents of time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".