MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7023440780

Paleoecology of microbial-rich Late Frasnian carbonate slope buildups, Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin

2021· dissertation· en· W7023440780 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrainstoneCarbonateFaciesOoidGeosynclineReefAragonite
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The late Frasnian Nisku Formation in subsurface Western Canada hosts the last known episode of carbonate buildup in the Cynthia-Winterburn basin below the Frasnian-Famennian boundary. The Zeta Lake Member is composed of dozens of carbonate buildups around the basin, although many compose a NE-SW oriented structure informally known as the Pembina Pinnacle Reef Trend. Four paleoecological communities are present in these late Devonian reefal environs: coral-pelmetazoan-microbial, coral-stromatoporoid-bivalve, coral-stromatoporoid-microbial, and stromatoporoid-microbial. Paleoecological communities differ principally by function and substrate colonization. The majority of buildups accreted in two growth phases under similar oligophotic to mesophotic conditions but different hydrodynamic regimes. Phase I accumulated during transgression and highstand as a mud-mound core with a low diversity coral motif. Phase II accumulated during falling sea level as a reef. Framework facies are composed of i) sub-cm scale rugose colonies with polymuds that approximate a bank meadow, or ii) carbonate crusts with synsedimentary cement and microbial biolithites with relatively minor contribution from metazoans that mimic interior reef strata. Fine-grained sediment that infills boundstones is grouped into four mud microfacies. Mud 1 and Mud 2 are reworked biogenic, resembling firmgrounds, with Mud 1 being microbial-enriched and low diversity while Mud 2 has highest skeletal diversity and terrigenous siliciclastics. Muds 3 and 4 are interpreted organic framework that could support stromatactis and create shelter cavities. Generally, Mud 3 has tubular calcimicrobes and is found in all coral-spongiostromate facies, whereas Mud 4 has dendritic calcimicrobes and increases within stromatoporoid facies relative to coral facies. These microfacies confirm a microbial-origin for fine-grained carbonate within late Frasnian buildups. Hyperspectral analysis in the short-wave infrared range is used to characterize four key buildup components: micrite, microbial carbonate (Renalcis), skeletal carbonate and pore-filling cement. Segmentation by threshold method reveals that the absorption feature strength of water and calcite are sufficient to distinguish target components. Renalcis has very high raw reflectance attributed to very fine crystal size and is readily distinguishable from other carbonate components. This study demonstrates the feasibility of short-wave infrared reflectance spectroscopy to isolate and potentially quantify microbial carbonate in compositionally similar ancient reef strata.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.102

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils→French-language works237,207→