MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7023612427

Panel on Patronage / Table ronde sur le patronage

2018· article· fr· W7023612427 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsCabinet (room)Principal (computer security)KnightTreasury
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At the beginning of 1987, the Journal of Canadian Studies brought together three persons whose experience as politicians or political managers gives them a rich perspective on the political process, and the role of patronage therein. Jean-Luc Pepin’s long political career spanned a variety of important portfolios in the Pearson and Trudeau governments, as well as the chairmanships of the Anti-Inflation Board and of the Task Force on Canadian Unity. After a twenty-year absence he has now returned to teaching political science at the University of Ottawa. William Neville served as an aide to several Liberal cabinet ministers before becoming a Conservative candidate and advisor. He served as Principal Secretary to Prime Minister Joe Clark in 1979–80, and is now president of the Ottawa consulting firm, Public Affairs International. William Knight served as federal MP for Assiniboia and as Principal Secretary to Saskatchewan Premier Allan Blakeney before taking up his current role as Chief-of-Staff for federal NDP leader Ed Broadbent. The discussion was moderated by Jeffrey Simpson, Ottawa columnist for the Globe and Mail, and by Ralph Heintzman, member of the Journal’s editorial board and co-editor of this special issue. The following is an edited transcript of the discussion. Abstract: Au début de 1987, la Revue d’éludes canadiennes à réuni trois personnes qui, en tant que politiciens ou conseillers politiques, ont acquis une connaissance intime du processus politique, y compris le rôle du patronage là-dedans. Au cours de sa longue carrière politique Jean-Luc Pepin a été titulaire de plusieurs ministères importants dans les gouvernements Pearson et Trudeau, et a présidé la Commission de lutte contre l’inflation ainsi que la Commission de l’unité canadienne. Après une absence de vingt ans il est maintenant de retour à l’Université d’Ottawa où il enseigne la science politique. William Neville a été adjoint à plusieurs ministres libéraux fédéraux avant de devenir candidat et conseiller pour le Parti conservateur. II a été chef de cabinet auprès du premier ministre Joe Clark en 1979–80, et il est maintenant président de la firme de conseillers en affaires publiques. Public Affairs International. William Knight a été député fédéral d’Assiniboia et chef de cabinet auprès du premier ministre de la Saskatchewan, Allan Blakeney, avant de devenir chef de cabinet dans le bureau du leader fédéral du NPD, M. Ed Broadbent. La table ronde était présidée par Jeffrey Simpson, chroniqueur à Ottawa pour le Globe and Mail, et par Ralph Heintzman, membre du comité de rédaction de la Revue et co-éditeur de ce numéro spécial. Suit l’essentiel de la discussion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.598
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0090.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0080.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0580.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University)→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→